The first-ever Enhanced Games (open to those using performance-enhancing drugs) featured 42 athletes, three of whom were competing clean. All three won their respective events.
This site is made possible by member support. π
Big thanks to Arcustech for hosting the site and offering amazing tech support.
When you buy through links on kottke.org, I may earn an affiliate commission. Thanks for supporting the site!
kottke.org. home of fine hypertext products since 1998.
Beloved by 86.47% of the web.
The first-ever Enhanced Games (open to those using performance-enhancing drugs) featured 42 athletes, three of whom were competing clean. All three won their respective events.
Comments 6
thread
latest
popular
FWIW I think the "clean" athletes were just not on the event's official enhancement program. They could well have been doping for all we know (especially given the history of Fred Kerley).
It turns out almost all the running times were incredibly slow (slower than some high school races), and as this video suggests, the biggest difference the swimmers had was wearing the special suits that aren't normally allowed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCsf49OwvmU
I'm surprised no one has mentioned this yet, but this is not an entirely new concept. They tried something similar back in 1988:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAdG-iTilWU
Did not even have to click this link to know exactly where it was going.
"some sort of fish paralyzer..."
Most of the athletes with top times in the 100m were doping anyway. Pretty much everyone except for Usain Bolt!
This entire stunt also feels engineered to appeal to athletes who have aged out of competition and canβt accept it.
Also: do any women compete? All coverage seems focused on men or do doping women have too much testosterone that would trigger a whole OTHER rage-inducing topic?
Hello! In order to comment or fave, you need to be a current kottke.org member. If you'd like to sign up for a membership to support the site and join the conversation, you can explore your options here.
Existing members can sign in here. If you're a former member, you can renew your membership.
Note: If you are a member and tried to log in, it didn't work, and now you're stuck in a neverending login loop of death, try disabling any ad blockers or extensions. Or try logging out and then back in. Still having trouble? Email me!
In order to comment or fave, you need to be a current kottke.org member. Check out your options for renewal.
If you feel like this comment goes against the grain of the community guidelines or is otherwise inappropriate, please let me know and I will take a look at it.
Hello! In order to leave a comment, you need to be a current kottke.org member. If you'd like to sign up for a membership to support the site and join the conversation, you can explore your options here.
Existing members can sign in here. If you're a former member, you can renew your membership.
Note: If you are a member and tried to log in, it didn't work, and now you're stuck in a neverending login loop of death, try disabling any ad blockers or extensions. Or try logging out and then back in. Still having trouble? Email me!