The 25 Best Films of 2024: A Video Countdown
Film critic David Ehrlich has dropped his annual visual love letter to cinema in the form of an expertly cut & crafted video countdown of his top 25 movies of 2024. You can also watch on Vimeo. Please note before you watch though:
This video includes a significant amount of footage from the endings of several films, most notably “Challengers,” “The Substance,” and “I Saw the TV Glow.”
The musical choice for Nosferatu had me cackling — an absolute perfect selection. Here’s the full list of his selections:
25. The Outrun
24. The Breaking Ice
23. Megalopolis
22. Hard Truths
21. The End
20. Babygirl
19. Juror #2
18. The First Omen
17. Between the Temples
16. The Brutalist
15. Flow
14. All We Imagine as Light
13. Evil Does Not Exist
12. The Substance
11. Close Your Eyes
10. I Saw the TV Glow
9. Nosferatu
8. The Beast
7. Challengers
6. A Different Man
5. Do Not Expect Too Much from the End of the World
4. Anora
3. Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga
2. No Other Land
1. Nickel Boys
On a personal note, I’ve seen only two of these films — three out of the six movie theaters I usually go to within an hour’s drive of my house permanently closed in 2024. There’s a lot less diversity in offerings now…everyone has to show the same blockbuster stuff because that’s what most people want to see and I don’t really care for the experience offered by the one remaining theater that shows more arthouse stuff. As usual, Ehrlich has got me fired up to fill in the gaps in my film watching, though it’s going to be impossible for me to see Nickel Boys until it comes out on streaming in like April or May.
Comments 9
thread
latest
popular
I continue to be surprised by the seemingly durable critical appreciation of Megalopolis. That movie was as hot a mess as I have seen in recent years.
I knew in advance it was getting very polarized reviews, but saw it nonetheless, giving Coppola's the benefit of the doubt. It's definitely two plus hours I'd like to have back.
it really was that bad, it wasn't even visually/cinematically interesting, a question I left with was: where did all the money go? my sense is some people thought it was "so bad it was good," it did drift into camp at times, but didn't stay there. and others gave a few stars for being bold, unique, auteur expression (Brody in the New Yorker).
Such a wonderfully edited video.
Don't go out of your way to see The Brutalist. We went yesterday to get our minds off the inauguration. Bad choice. Reminded me of a friend who went to the movies to get over a break up. Unfortunately, his buddy took him to see Apocalypse Now.
Jason, I'm sorry your theaters closed. I was impressed that so many of your media diet movies were seen "in person" in 2024. Despite my local theater having fewer but fancy, fully reclinable seats, I feel uncomfortable there. As if I'm watching from my couch but strangers are in my living room. Can’t believe I’m going to say this but … maybe it was better when we all sat shoulder to shoulder and got cricks in our necks?
Nickel Boys was a slog in the theaters. Love his books, and this is probably my #1, but it was disorienting. I really liked the approach to telling the story, but I'm not sure it worked for a 2 hour film. Maybe it's better at home where you can walk away for a few minutes.
As a counterpoint, I’ve seen it twice in the theater. The first time I was emotionally so involved that I feel like I didn’t really take in the nuances of the POV, so I went back to try to track the directing choices more closely. I think it’s an astonishing film.
After many (many) viewings of Ehrlich's videos, I think they work best if the viewer is already super into the past year's films-- lots of reading reviews from Cannes and Sundance, following critics, perusing lists, etc. Not necessarily having seen them all, but able to pick out who's in what and what the plot and the buzz is, which takes a certain kind of moviegoer, one who's willing to kind of spoil themself a bit before seeing a film. If you don't know anything about any of it, film isn't really your thing, then Ehrlich's introduction each year is about as far as you should watch, until you've seen a few (half? more? all?) of the films.
A significant part of the pleasure in his videos comes from understanding how the musical choices match the theme of the films, and catching which moments Ehrlich chooses to feature in his little vignette for each film (he often flashes one crucial scene that doesn't resonate without context), and maybe even knowing in advance how Ehrlich thinks/feels about the films. I'm finding the videos are better *after* I've seen the films. I certainly wouldn't have felt the absolute elation I felt during the Substance section if I hadn't seen The Substance.
That said, these are always (always) my favorite ritual of the new year. Like a second Christmas when they drop. And he's absolutely pushing himself to new heights every year-- the conversation between films that threaded through this one, culminating in the Saoirse-conducting-the-sea montage, is an evolution.
Am I the only one that doesn't like the 'Mad Max' movies?
Both the original and Furiosa come up in the top 3 - if not the top spot - of many lists from people I respect and whose taste generally aligns with mine, but those 2 movies do absolutely nothing for me.
Hello! In order to comment or fave, you need to be a current kottke.org member. If you'd like to sign up for a membership to support the site and join the conversation, you can explore your options here.
Existing members can sign in here. If you're a former member, you can renew your membership.
Note: If you are a member and tried to log in, it didn't work, and now you're stuck in a neverending login loop of death, try disabling any ad blockers or extensions that you have installed on your browser...sometimes they can interfere with the Memberful links. Still having trouble? Email me!
In order to comment or fave, you need to be a current kottke.org member. Check out your options for renewal.
This is the name that'll be displayed next to comments you make on kottke.org; your email will not be displayed publicly. I'd encourage you to use your real name (or at least your first name and last initial) but you can also pick something that you go by when you participate in communities online. Choose something durable and reasonably unique (not "Me" or "anon"). Please don't change this often. No impersonation.
Note: I'm letting folks change their display names because the membership service that kottke.org uses collects full names and I thought some people might not want their names displayed publicly here. If it gets abused, I might disable this feature.
If you feel like this comment goes against the grain of the community guidelines or is otherwise inappropriate, please let me know and I will take a look at it.
Hello! In order to leave a comment, you need to be a current kottke.org member. If you'd like to sign up for a membership to support the site and join the conversation, you can explore your options here.
Existing members can sign in here. If you're a former member, you can renew your membership.
Note: If you are a member and tried to log in, it didn't work, and now you're stuck in a neverending login loop of death, try disabling any ad blockers or extensions that you have installed on your browser...sometimes they can interfere with the Memberful links. Still having trouble? Email me!