Is My Blue Your Blue? A visual perception test that judges what you call blue and green and compares it with others’ results. I am “bluer than 68% of the population.” Now do red/pink, red/orange, and blue/purple!
Advertise here with Carbon Ads
This site is made possible by member support. 💞
Big thanks to Arcustech for hosting the site and offering amazing tech support.
When you buy through links on kottke.org, I may earn an affiliate commission. Thanks for supporting the site!
kottke.org. home of fine hypertext products since 1998.
Beloved by 86.47% of the web.
Comments 13
thread
latest
popular
I came out at 81% blue. I wonder how accurate this test can be given that everyone has differently calibrated screens and monitors. I am a graphic designer and have my monitors calibrated to replicate colors closest to print accuracy.
What did you use for calibration?
I just create a custom profile using the built-in calibration tools in MacOS. I have 2 bog-standard Dell 27-inch 4k monitors, and I use a Pantone color book with CMYK values to test against my monitor color in my home office and adjust as best I can to match. It's not perfect, but it suits my needs.
My boundary is at hue 171, greener than 68% of the population. Another designer here. It was really difficult to label turquise as either blue or green. Did not like it.
I felt the same. "Your boundary is at hue 164, greener than 94% of the population. For you, turquoise is blue."
I tipped my laptop screen back and forth and watched the color change from blue to green. I tried to put it in the middle, but I got 96% blue. I think I just calibrated it to the first test item. Fun concept, but too obviously flawed to really feel meaningful
I landed at 174, right at the population median. However, being color blind, several of the choices were nearly grey to my eyes. I just stuck the greys in the green category. :)
wtf, 92% green !?!
I'm at 174 and goddammit, turquoise IS green. I think. Or maybe it's blue. Ugh.
Go with your gut. It’s definitely green.
Blue and green are shades the same colour (translated as "grue") in a number of cultures, which I guess is what this is showing, that those of us who think they're as distinct as, say, red and blue, are making a slight category error.
"Your boundary is at hue 174, just like the population median. You're a true neutral." Woo-hoo! I am completely uninteresting.
* 16" MacBook Pro screen.
"Your boundary is at hue 175, bluer than 66% of the population. For you, turquoise is green." That steep curve sure makes individual gradients have big steps in population percentage.
Hello! In order to comment or fave, you need to be a current kottke.org member. If you'd like to sign up for a membership to support the site and join the conversation, you can explore your options here.
Existing members can sign in here. If you're a former member, you can renew your membership.
Note: If you are a member and tried to log in, it didn't work, and now you're stuck in a neverending login loop of death, try disabling any ad blockers or extensions. Or try logging out and then back in. Still having trouble? Email me!
In order to comment or fave, you need to be a current kottke.org member. Check out your options for renewal.
If you feel like this comment goes against the grain of the community guidelines or is otherwise inappropriate, please let me know and I will take a look at it.
This thread is closed for new comments & replies. Thanks to everyone for participating!